S. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| E. S. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2019cv01548 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (New York City Department of Education answer due 6/3/2019.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/3/2019) (rro)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Priscilla Denterlein dated 04/01/2019. Document filed by New York City Department of Education.(Denterlein, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Priscilla Denterlein on behalf of New York City Department of Education. (Denterlein, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mendillo, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by E. S.(individually), E. S.(on behalf of M.S., a child with a disability). (Mendillo, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16368344)Document filed by E. S.(individually), E. S.(on behalf of M.S., a child with a disability).(Mendillo, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: S. et al v. New York City Department of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New York City Department of Education | |
| Represented By: | Priscilla Denterlein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: E. S. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Mendillo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
