Auguastin et al v. Nielsen et al
| Ms. Marlie Legagneur and Mr. Pierre Auguastin |
| Director L. Francis Cissna, District Director Thomas Cioppa, US Attorney General William Pelham Barr and Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen |
| 1:2019cv02402 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Thomas Cioppa, L. Francis Cissna, William Pelham Barr, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Pierre Auguastin, Marlie Legagneur. (Crowley, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Pierre Auguastin.(Crowley, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Marlie Legagneur.(Crowley, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Crowley, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against William Pelham Barr, Thomas Cioppa, L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen M. Nielsen (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16515442).Document filed by Pierre Auguastin, Marlie Legagneur.(Crowley, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
