Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv03547
Filed: April 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Gregory H. Woods
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 198]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinu ed without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is ma de by March 23, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 3/23/2022.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 2/23/2022) (tg)
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER granting 190 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document; granting 190 Letter Motion to Stay re: 190 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Spoliation Sanctions addressed to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox from Sam uel A. Blaustein dated November 23, 2021. LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 187 Order on Motion for Discovery, addressed to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox from Samuel A. Blaustein dated November 23, 2021. The time for Ashly Wager to file a motion and complete the authorized deposition is stayed, until after Judge Vyskocil resolves G4S' objections to Docket Entry No. 187. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 11/23/2021) (va)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 187 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 155 Motion for Discovery. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion, Docket Entry No. 155, is granted as explained in this memorandum and order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 11/15/2021) (va)
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 176 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to reinstate, on the docket sheet, the gavel for Docket Entry No. 155, the motion for discovery, erroneously indicated as resolved in the Court's September 23, 2021 Memorandum and Order, Docket Entry No. 174. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/24/2021) (va)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 174 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 155 Motion for Discovery. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs motion for attorneys' fees, Docket Entry No. 155, is granted and an award of $77,838.25 in attorneys' fees and $1,383.37 in expenses is warranted. The plaintiff shall file her application for attorneys' fees in connection with the instant fee application, no longer than five double-spaced pages accompanied by evidence, on or before September 30, 2021. Any challen ge to the reasonableness of the fee application, no longer than five double-spaced pages, must be filed on or before October 7, 2021, and any reply, no longer than three double-spaced pages, may be filed on or before October 10, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/23/2021) (va)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 173 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 150 Motion for Sanctions. For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's motion for sanctions, Docket Entry No. 150, is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/21/2021) (va)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER granting 148 Letter Motion for Discovery. The parties June 4, 2021, joint letter-request for an order scheduling motion practice, Docket Entry No. 148, is granted as follows: (a) each motion is due no later than June 21, 2021; (b) the response to each motion is due no later than June 28, 2021; (c) any reply is due no later than July 5, 2021; and (d) each motion shall be filed separately. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 6/8/2021) (ate)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a settlement conference shall be held in the above-captioned action on March 10, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The conference will be held by telephone. The parties are directed to call (888) 557-8511 and, thereafter, enter access code 4862532. ( Telephone Conference set for 3/10/2021 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 2/16/2021) (va)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER: By an order dated January 28, 2021, the assigned district judge remanded this matter to the undersigned for further reconsideration of Plaintiff's request for expenses consistent with this Opinion and Order and Rule 37. Docket Entry N o. 132. On or before February 11, 2021, the plaintiff shall file her submissions in connection with the remand order. Local Civil Rule 6.1 of this court shall govern the opposition and reply. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 1/29/2021) (nb)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deposition of Ron Posner shall be resumed and continue for a period not to exceed two and one-half hours. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 1/28/21) (yv)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 126 NOTICE OF POST-DISCOVERY CONFERENCE: The Court directs counsel for all parties to appear at a Post-Discovery Conference on February 23, 2021, at 11:00 AM. The conference will be held telephonically. To join theconference, dial 888-278-0296 a nd enter access code 5195844.On or before February 11, 2021, the parties shall submit a joint letter regarding the statusof the case; as further set forth herein. ( Telephone Conference set for 2/23/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 11/30/2020) (mro)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER denying without prejudice 105 Letter Motion to Stay. The Court is in receipt of multiple letters from the parties regarding discovery disputes [ECF # 102, 103, 104, 106, 107] and a request to stay the case [ECF # 105]. It is hereby ORDE RED that the request for a stay is DENIED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the case will be referred to the designated Magistrate Judge for resolution of the remaining discovery issues. Finally, it is ORDERED that the status conference scheduled for August 4, 2020 is adjourned sine die. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 7/29/2020) (mro)
May 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 96 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER granting 95 Letter Motion for Discovery. All parties consent to conducting all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. 636(c). This case is to be tr ied to a jury. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than 6/29/2020. Depositions to be completed by 6/29/2020. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than 8/27/2020. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their pr esent best estimate of the length of trial is: 5 days. A Post-Discovery Conference is scheduled for 9/27/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 18C of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 5/7/2020) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?