Lawyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Steve Lawyer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 7:2019cv05474
Filed: June 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman
Referring Judge: Lisa Margaret Smith
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: On June 13, 2019, the Court filed its Standing Order In Re: Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings in Social Security Cases, pursuant to which Defendant is to file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings within 90 days of being served with the complaint. Docket # 5. As no proof of service has been filed by Plaintiff, the Court does not know when the 90-day period for filing the certified transcript expires. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file proof of service forthwith and shall notify the Court if the 90-day period has expired without filing of the certified transcript. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 8/7/2019) (rj)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (jgo)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/8/2019) (rj)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/8/2019) (rj)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Steve Lawyer.(Berger, Daniel)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Steve Lawyer. (Berger, Daniel)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Berger, Daniel)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Steve Lawyer.(Berger, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Lawyer
Represented By: Daniel Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?