OHVA, Inc. v. National Bankcard Inc.

Plaintiff: OHVA, Inc.
Defendant: National Bankcard Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv06114
Filed: June 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: P Kevin Castel
Nature of Suit: Patent
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED STANDING ORDER IN RE IMPLEMENTATION OF PATENT PILOT PROGRAM IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 21, 2011). It appearing that the Court has elected to participate in the Pilot Project for Patent Cases established pursuant to Pub L. No. 111-349, 124 Stat. 3674. Therefore, effective November 21, 2011, the Court's participation in the Patent Pilot Project will commence and shall include pro se cases. The Pilot program will be subject to the following procedures: When a designated Pilot judge receives a patent case on initial assignment, the case shall be assigned to that judge for all purposes, without further notice to the Assignment Committee and the Case Assignment Unit.... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (wb)
July 1, 2019 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to National Bankcard Inc.. (dnh)
July 1, 2019 Filing 7 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (dnh)
July 1, 2019 Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (dnh)
July 1, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
July 1, 2019 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh)
July 1, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh)
July 1, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Isaac Rabicoff. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 28:1441; County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1400; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (dnh)
July 1, 2019 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #6 MOTION for Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17168937. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Illinois;. Re-file the motion as Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (wb)
June 30, 2019 Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Isaac Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-17168937. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by OHVA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Decl of Rabicoff, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Cert of Good Standing)(Rabicoff, Isaac) Modified on 7/1/2019 (wb).
June 30, 2019 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to National Bankcard Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by OHVA, Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac)
June 30, 2019 Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by OHVA, Inc..(Rabicoff, Isaac)
June 30, 2019 Filing 3 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.(Rabicoff, Isaac)
June 30, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac)
June 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Bankcard Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17168932)Document filed by OHVA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Rabicoff, Isaac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OHVA, Inc. v. National Bankcard Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OHVA, Inc.
Represented By: Isaac Rabicoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Bankcard Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?