United States of America v. Bracken
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Glen T. Bracken |
1:2019cv06512 |
July 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
George B Daniels |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 rc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to Glen T. Bracken. (km) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of John Manfredi in Support re: #10 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) |
Filing 10 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT: Notice to Attorney John Manfredi. RE-FILE Document No. #9 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Re-file the proposed clerk's certificate as one entry, then file the affidavit in support as a separate entry. (Filed under other answers, affidavit in support of a non-motion). (km) |
Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 declaration) (Manfredi, John) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 8/15/2019 (km). |
Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 8/14/2019 (km). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT: Notice to Attorney John Manfredi. RE-FILE Document No. #8 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Please refer to ECF Rule 16.1. The request to enter default is no longer needed. Re-file the proposed clerk's certificate as one entry under proposed orders (please use the sample clerk's certificate that is on our website. The one that was filed on the docket is not as to form), then file the affidavit/declaration in support as a separate entry. (Filed under other answers, affidavit/declaration in support of a non-motion). (km) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Glen T. Bracken served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019. Service was accepted by Pamela Bracken, sister, on behalf of Defendant. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) |
Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 9/24/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge George B. Daniels. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/23/2019) (ks) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Glen T. Bracken. (dnh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Glen T. Bracken, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Manfredi, John) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUEST - PDF ERROR REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Glen T. Bracken, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by United States of America. (Manfredi, John) Modified on 7/15/2019 (sj). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney John Stephen Manfredi to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; Filing court error. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney John Stephen Manfredi. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: United States of America. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney John Stephen Manfredi to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney John Stephen Manfredi to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the event wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John Stephen Manfredi. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand (none); County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $26,000; the County code has been modified to New York. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge George B. Daniels. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glen T. Bracken. Document filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 exhibit a, #2 proposed summons, #3 civil cover)(Manfredi, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. Bracken | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Glen T. Bracken | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | John Stephen Manfredi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.