Hazan v. Unum Group
| Victor Hazan |
| Unum Group |
| 1:2019cv06954 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ct |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew I. Hamelsky on behalf of Unum Group. (Hamelsky, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric M Davis on behalf of Victor Hazan. (Davis, Eric) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Order served on Victor Hazan on August 2, 2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Unum Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Exhibit Order)(Scarcella, Jenifer) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference; Individual Rules of Practice served on Victor Hazan on August 2, 2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Unum Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Exhibit Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference, #3 Exhibit Individual Rules of Practice)(Scarcella, Jenifer) |
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court's Order of July 26, 2019, directed Defendant to serve a copy of that Order on Plaintiff and to file proof of such service on the docket within two business days. ECF No. 5. No such proof of service appears on the docket. It is therefore ORDERED that - if Defendant did serve that Order on Plaintiff - Defendant file proof of such service immediately, or if that Order has not yet been served on Plaintiff - that Defendant serve a copy of that Order and this one on Plaintiff through his counsel and file proof of such service on ECF within one business day of the date of this Order. As before, Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to file a notice of appearance on the docket within two business days of such service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/2/2019) (ne)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Answer served on Victor Hazan on August 1, 2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Unum Group. (Scarcella, Jenifer) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Unum Group.(Scarcella, Jenifer) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/23/2019 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/26/2019) (ne)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Jenifer Ann Scarcella. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $848,350,000; Arbitration code e (Exempt); County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $848,000; the Arbitration code has been deleted; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal, Rule 7.1 Statement, Civil Cover Sheet served on Victor Hazan on July 25, 2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Unum Group. (Scarcella, Jenifer) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Scarcella, Jenifer) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Unum Group.(Scarcella, Jenifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Case Number: 653649/2019. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17312295).Document filed by Unum Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Service of Process)(Scarcella, Jenifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hazan v. Unum Group | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unum Group | |
| Represented By: | Jenifer Ann Scarcella |
| Represented By: | Andrew I. Hamelsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victor Hazan | |
| Represented By: | Eric M Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
