Torres v. United States of America et al
| Angel Torres |
| Raul Torres, United States of America and Michael Vieira |
| 1:2019cv09098 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Raul Torres served on 10/24/2019, answer due 11/14/2019. Service was accepted by Mr. Rojas, Mailbox store Clerk. Document filed by Angel Torres. (Russo, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. United States of America served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019; Michael Vieira served on 10/23/2019, answer due 11/13/2019. Service was accepted by Osrick Gordon, Legal Clerk. Document filed by Angel Torres. (Russo, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Raul Torres, United States of America, Michael Vieira. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Thomas Walter Russo. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Raul Torres, United States of America, Michael Vieira, Angel Torres. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Thomas Walter Russo to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the event wrong event type was used to file the civil cover sheet; First page is upside down;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Thomas Walter Russo. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $5,000,000,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $5,000,000;. (pc) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to United States of America, a governmental agency, Michael Vieira, an individual and Raul Torres, an individual, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Angel Torres. (Russo, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raul Torres, United States of America, Michael Vieira. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17694480)Document filed by Angel Torres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Russo, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
