Lavelle v. Ackerman Institute for the Family
Plaintiff: Lisa Lavelle
Defendant: Ackerman Institute for the Family
Case Number: 1:2019cv09675
Filed: October 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Denise L Cote
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrea Maria Paparella on behalf of Lisa Lavelle. (Paparella, Andrea)
October 21, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lisia Lynette Leon on behalf of Ackerman Institute for the Family. (Leon, Lisia)
October 21, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meredith Rosen Cavallaro on behalf of Ackerman Institute for the Family. (Cavallaro, Meredith)
October 21, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ackerman Institute for the Family. (dnh)
October 21, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Grenert, Michael)
October 21, 2019 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ackerman Institute For The Family, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lisa Lavelle. (Grenert, Michael)
October 21, 2019 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh)
October 21, 2019 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Denise L. Cote. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh)
October 21, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
October 21, 2019 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael Evan Grenert. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Nassau. (dnh)
October 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ackerman Institute for the Family. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17801123)Document filed by Lisa Lavelle.(Grenert, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lavelle v. Ackerman Institute for the Family
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ackerman Institute for the Family
Represented By: Meredith Rosen Cavallaro
Represented By: Lisia Lynette Leon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Lavelle
Represented By: Andrea Maria Paparella
Represented By: Michael Evan Grenert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?