Jones et al v. NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC et al
| Kenneth Rose and Seymour Jones |
| Thomas Auringer and NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC |
| 1:2019cv10043 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 1/21/2020.(mf) |
Filing 9
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 12/16/2019. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/23/2019) (mf)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Thomas Auringer served on 11/4/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. Service was accepted by Authorized Employee. Document filed by Seymour Jones; Kenneth Rose. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Thomas Auringer, NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC.(Donovan, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC.(Donovan, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC served on 11/1/2019, answer due 11/22/2019. Service was accepted by NY Secretary of State. Document filed by Seymour Jones; Kenneth Rose. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas Auringer, NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC, and Thomas Auringer, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Seymour Jones, Kenneth Rose. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Auringer, NYC Crane Hoist & Rigging, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17858727)Document filed by Seymour Jones, Kenneth Rose.(Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
