Mendez v. Edelman Shoe, Inc.
| Himelda Mendez |
| Edelman Shoe, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv11185 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Edelman Shoe, Inc. served on 1/6/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Himelda Mendez. (Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Edelman Shoe, Inc.. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bradly Gurion Marks. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Himelda Mendez. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bradly Gurion Marks. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code n (None);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff);. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Edelman Shoe, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Himelda Mendez. (Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edelman Shoe, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18229631)Document filed by Himelda Mendez.(Marks, Bradly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendez v. Edelman Shoe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Himelda Mendez | |
| Represented By: | Bradly Gurion Marks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Edelman Shoe, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
