No v. USA LWS (NYC) et al
Plaintiff: Jeong-Suk No
Defendant: USA LWS (NYC), FTC, WeWork and Visa
Case Number: 1:2019cv11674
Filed: December 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CIVIL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to submit an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 in filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/4/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
February 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/4/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
February 4, 2020 Mailed a copy of #8 Order of Dismissal, #9 CIVIL JUDGMENT with Notice of Right to Appeal to Jeong-Suk No 123 W 13th St Apt #1205 New York, NY 10011.(aea) Modified on 2/4/2020 (aea).
January 23, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT from Jeong Suk No, re: - Evidences, Notice of Motions etc. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No.(sc)
December 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an amended IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 1/27/2020. Amended In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 1/27/2020. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/26/2019) (Attachments: #1 Amended IFP Application)(dmg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
December 26, 2019 Mailed a copy of #6 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application, to Jeong-Suk No 123 W 13th St Apt #1205 New York, NY 10011. (aea)
December 26, 2019 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
December 19, 2019 Filing 5 DECLARATION of Jeong-Suk No in Support re: #4 MOTION re Lawyers. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No. (sac)
December 19, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION re Lawyers. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No. (sac)
December 19, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Jeong-Suk No consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No. (sac)
December 19, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against FTC, USA LWS (NYC), Visa, WeWork. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No. (sac)
December 19, 2019 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jeong-Suk No. (sac)
December 19, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: No v. USA LWS (NYC) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA LWS (NYC)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FTC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WeWork
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Visa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeong-Suk No
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?