Reid v. City of New York et al
| Cedric Reid |
| Razia Ferdous, Terry Moran, Carl J. Koenigsmann, City of New York, Susanna Nayshuler, Schupak, Anthony J. Annucci, NYC Health & Hospitals, Dr. Hammer, Osourne A. McKay, Michael Washington, Allen Riley, Michael Capra, Correction Officer Everett, Thomas J. Loughren, Robert Morton, Patsy Yang, Martha W. King and Veronica Monroe |
| 1:2020cv00644 |
| January 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
DECLARATION of Cedric Reid In Response to Order to Show Cause, re: #4 Order 30 Days Other (case opening). Document filed by Cedric Reid. (sc) Modified on 3/13/2020 (sc).
|
|
Mailed a copy of #5 Letter, to Cedric Reid DIN No. 18A1936 Great Meadow Correctional Facility BOX 51 Comstock, NY 12821-0051..(vba)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER from C. Reid, dated 2/12/20 re: (NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS) - Plaintiff requests that the Court inform him as to whether the Court received his new 42:1983, plus a Prisoner Authorization form, IFP Application and Request for an Injunction. Plaintiff informs of his new address at Great Meadow Corr. Facility, Box 51, Comstock, New York 12821-0051. Document filed by Cedric Reid.(sc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court directs Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not deny his IFP application under the PLRA's three strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff must file a declaration within thirty days explaining any reason why he should not be barred under the PLRA. A declaration form is attached to this order for Plaintiff's convenience. If Plaintiff does not show cause, or if he fails to respond to this order, the Court will deny Plaintiff's IFP application, dismiss this action without prejudice, and bar Plaintiff under 1915(g) from filing future actions IFP while he is a prisoner. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/14/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Mailed a copy of #4 Order 30 Days Other (case opening), to Cedric Reid DIN No. 18A1936 Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562. (aea)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Cedric Reid. (sac)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Anthony J. Annucci, Michael Capra, City of New York, Everett, Razia Ferdous, Hammer, Martha W. King, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Thomas J. Loughren, Osourne A. McKay, Veronica Monroe, Terry Moran, Robert Morton, NYC Health & Hospitals, Susanna Nayshuler, Allen Riley, Schupak, Michael Washington, Patsy Yang. Document filed by Cedric Reid. (sac)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Cedric Reid. (sac)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (sac)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
