Hutchenson v. Stein Mart, Inc. et al
| Robert Hutchenson |
| MaryAnn Morin, Richard Sisisky, Thomas L. Cole, Timothy Cost, Jay Stein, Lisa Galanti, Burton M. Tansky, Stein Mart, Inc., Irwin Cohen and D. Hunt Hawkins |
| 1:2020cv01984 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P Kevin Castel |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Irwin Cohen, Thomas L. Cole, Timothy Cost, Lisa Galanti, D. Hunt Hawkins, MaryAnn Morin, Richard Sisisky, Jay Stein, Stein Mart, Inc., Burton M. Tansky. Document filed by Robert Hutchenson. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kuehn, Justin) |
Filing 4
ORDER. Due to the COVID-19 situation, conferences with the Court in civil cases through May 1, 2020 will be held by teleconferencing. Counsel for the plaintiff(s) shall arrange for the conference call. Each scheduled conference will take place on the date and time originally set. The conference in this case is scheduled for May 1, 2020 at 10:45 a.m. No later than seventy-two hours before the conference, plaintiff(s)' counsel shall: (a) docket a letter on ECF to the Court with copy to all opposing counsel containing the call-in information and email the letter to castelnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov; and (b) for an initial pretrial conference, email a copy of the agreed upon (or disputed) Civil Case Management Plan & Scheduling Order to: castelnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/26/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 5/1/2020 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel, as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/9/2020) (jwh)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kuehn, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Irwin Cohen, Thomas L. Cole, Timothy Cost, Lisa Galanti, D. Hunt Hawkins, MaryAnn Morin, Richard Sisisky, Jay Stein, Stein Mart, Inc., Burton M. Tansky. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19022600)Document filed by Robert Hutchenson..(Kuehn, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
