Spicer et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A
Timothy Simon Spicer, Jeffrey Paul Arnold Day and MARK ANDREW BULLOUGH |
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A. |
1:2020cv03784 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Orrie Adam Levy on behalf of MARK ANDREW BULLOUGH, Jeffrey Paul Arnold Day, Timothy Simon Spicer..(Levy, Orrie) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A., re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by MARK ANDREW BULLOUGH, Jeffrey Paul Arnold Day, Timothy Simon Spicer..(Frenchman, Kenneth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Frenchman, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19844854)Document filed by Timothy Simon Spicer, MARK ANDREW BULLOUGH, Jeffrey Paul Arnold Day. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Aegis DO Policy 2015-2016, #2 Exhibit B - Answer and Counterclaims (unredacted) as filed, #3 Exhibit C - Summary Judgment Decision, #4 Exhibit D - Motion Dismiss Decision, #5 Exhibit E - Spicer et al v Gardaworld Appellate Decision).(Frenchman, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.