Doe v. Cahill
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: Kevin Cahill
Case Number: 1:2020cv03908
Filed: May 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332t
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kevin Cahill, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by JANE DOE..(DeCarlo, Aurore)
May 19, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(DeCarlo, Aurore)
May 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-19899353)Document filed by JANE DOE..(DeCarlo, Aurore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Cahill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Represented By: Aurore Circle DeCarlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Cahill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?