Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
Maricela Garcia |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
1:2020cv05066 |
July 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gabriel W Gorenstein |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony Pantoja on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Pantoja, Joseph) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/23/2020, answer due 8/13/2020. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 13 NOTICE: The District Judge has referred this Social Security case to one of the Court's Magistrate Judges for a Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judges are judges selected by the District Judges to serve for terms of eight years. Magistrate Judges are highly qualified and very experienced. You have an option to agree to having the Magistrate Judge to whom your case has been referred decide your case instead of recommending a decision to the District Judge who would then review the Report and Recommendation and address any objections to it. If you consent to having the Magistrate Judge decide your case, the Magistrate Judge replaces the District Judge, thereby speeding up the resolution of the case (because only one judge instead of two will be involved in your case). Any appeal from a Magistrate Judge's decision following consent is directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the same way that an appeal from a District Judge's decision would be taken. (mml) |
Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/15/2020) (mml) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(dnh) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(dnh) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security..(dnh) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/09/2020) (ama) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis . Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security c/o U.S. Attorney General, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Maricela Garcia..(Osborn, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.