Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al
||July 31, 2020
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 31, 2020
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff brings this pro se action, for which the filing fee has been paid, alleging that his former employer subjected him to discrimination, retaliation, and harassment. The Court dismisses the complaint for the reasons set forth below. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Any employment discrimination claims against Deloitte are dismissed without prejudice to the matter pending under docket numbe r 19-CV-10578. All other claims are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The motion for permission for electronic case filing is denied as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate it. (ECF 7.) The Court certifies u nder 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED . Motions terminated: 7 MOTION for Permission for A. Shukla to participate in electronic case filing in this case. filed by Ashu Shukla. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/31/2020) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?