Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Hector Gonzalez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2020cv07338
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sarah L Cave
Referring Judge: Jesse M Furman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION. Document filed by Hector Gonzalez. (sc)
October 20, 2020 Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher dated 10-20-20 re: nonconsent to the magistrate judge. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie)
October 15, 2020 Filing 10 LETTER from H. Gonzalez, dated 10/10/20 re: I would rather United States District Court Judge Jesse M. Furman conduct this proceeding. Document filed by Hector Gonzalez.(sc) Modified on 10/19/2020 (kgo).
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's Order dated September 14, 2020, the parties were required to confer regarding whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. See ECF No. 5. If both parties consent, they were required to email to FurmanNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form within two weeks of the date on which Defendant enters an appearance. If either party does not consent, they were to file, by the same date, a joint letter advising the Court that the parties do not consent. To date, the parties have not satisfied their obligations. As a courtesy, the parties' deadline is hereby EXTENDED, nunc pro tune, to October 20, 2020. Defendant shall serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff within one business day of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/13/2020) (ks)
September 25, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Hector Gonzalez, at 2960 West 31st Street Apt. 14-E Brooklyn, NY 11224, on 9/15/2020 Re: #5 Order of Service - Social Security via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases), in social security cases only, a flyer about pro bono attorneys available through the New York County Lawyers' Association. (bwa)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/14/20) (yv)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF SERVICE : The Clerk of Court shall notify the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York of the filing of this pro se case brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for which the filing fee has been waived. In accordance with this District's Standing Order governing pro se challenges to denials of social security benefits (see In re: Mots. J. Pleadings Social Sec. Cases, 16-MC-0171), the following briefing schedule applies: Within 90 days of the date of this Order, the Commissioner must serve and file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record (e-CAR), which will constitute the Commissioner's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint. If the Commissioner wishes to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Commissioner must do so within 60 days of the date on which the e-CAR was filed. The motion must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and a full description of the underlying administrative proceeding. The plaintiff must file an answering brief within 60 days of the filing of the Commissioner's motion. The Commissioner may file a reply within 21 days thereafter. Memoranda in support of or in opposition to any dispositive motion may not exceed 25 pages in length; reply memoranda may not exceed ten pages in length. A party seeking to exceed these page limitations must apply to the Court for leave to do so, with copies to all counsel, no fewer than seven days before the date on which the memorandum is due. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If the parties consent to having the Magistrate Judge decide the case, the Magistrate Judge replaces the District Judge, thereby speeding up the resolution of the case (because only one judge instead of two will be involved in the case). Any appeal from a Magistrate Judges decision following consent is directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the same way that an appeal from a District Judges decision would be taken. By contrast, if the parties do not consent to having the Magistrate Judge decide the case, the Magistrate Judge will first issue a Report and Recommendation, and the District Judge will then consider any objections either party has to the Report and Recommendation before a final judgment is entered, at which point an appeal to the Second Circuit could be taken. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. ( Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 12/14/2020.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/14/20) (yv) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/14/20) (yv)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 9, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Hector Gonzalez. (sac)
September 9, 2020 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Hector Gonzalez. (sac)
September 9, 2020 Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
September 9, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hector Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?