Wilshire v. L&M Development Partners et al
Plaintiff: Coanne Wilshire
Defendant: L&M Development and Lemle & Wolff Companies, L&M, Lemle & Wolff Co., L&M Development Partners, Larkspur LLC and Larkspur Managers LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv07998
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Coanne Wilshire 304 West 117 Street #3H New York, NY 10026, on 11/17/2020 Re: #9 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (aan)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS ISSUED as to L&M Development Partners, Larkspur LLC, Larkspur Managers LLC, Lemle & Wolff Co. (aan)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 11/17/2020 Re: Judge J. Paul Oetken #9 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Complaint, Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s)L&M Development Partners, Larkspur LLC, Larkspur Managers LLC, Lemle & Wolff Co. (aan)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Larkspur LLC, Larkspur Managers LLC, L&M Development Partners, and Lemle & Wolff Co., and deliver to the U.S. Marshals all documents necessary to effect service on these defendants. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/16/2020) (ks) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bcu)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/23/2020) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECLARATION of Coanne Wilshire, re: #4 Order Directing Original Signature. Document filed by Coanne Wilshire. (sc)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO SE by Coanne Wilshire. (sc)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE: Plaintiff is directed to submit a signed signature page to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signature Page due by 11/16/2020. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/15/2020) (Attachments: #1 Supplement Declaration) (scn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Mailed a copy of #4 Order Directing Original Signature, and a Declaration form, to Coanne Wilshire at 304 West 117 Street, New York, NY 10026. (kh)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Coanne Wilshire consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Coanne Wilshire.(sc)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against L&M Development Partners, Larkspur LLC, Larkspur Managers LLC, Lemle & Wolff Co. Document filed by Coanne Wilshire.(rdz) Modified on 11/16/2020 (sac).
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Coanne Wilshire..(rdz)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilshire v. L&M Development Partners et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Coanne Wilshire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L&M Development and Lemle & Wolff Companies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L&M
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lemle & Wolff Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L&M Development Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larkspur LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larkspur Managers LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?