Romero v. Nikon Inc.
| Josue Romero |
| Nikon Inc. |
| 1:2020cv08308 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER. The parties shall promptly inform the Court if they come to believe that a referral to a Magistrate Judge or the Court-annexed Mediation Program would be beneficial. In any event, no later than three business days after Defendant files an answer or otherwise responds to the Complaint, the parties shall file another joint letter providing the information described in the Court's October 7th order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/18/20) (yv)
|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT. Document filed by Nikon Inc...(Sherven, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 10
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 9. SO ORDERED. (Nikon Inc. answer due 1/4/2021.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/4/20) (yv)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . Document filed by Nikon Inc...(Rosenblum, Erika) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erika Hannah Rosenblum on behalf of Nikon Inc...(Rosenblum, Erika) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer E. Sherven on behalf of Nikon Inc...(Sherven, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Nikon Inc. served on 10/15/2020, answer due 11/5/2020. Service was accepted by Sou Zouky, Agent. Document filed by Josue Romero..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. No later than the earlier of 100 days from the date of this Order or two weeks after Defendant enters a notice of appearance, the parties shall file a joint letter (unless Defendant has not appeared, in which case Plaintiff shall file the letter individually), not to exceed two pages, including the following information in separately numbered paragraphs as further set forth in this Order. After reviewing the parties' submissions, the Court will decide if an initial pretrial conference is necessary.The parties' joint letter shall not exceed five (5) pages and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs as further set forth in this Order. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/7/20) (yv)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nikon Inc...(jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joseph H Mizrahi. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Josue Romero. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nikon Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Josue Romero..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nikon Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-21997390)Document filed by Josue Romero..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Romero v. Nikon Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nikon Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer E. Sherven |
| Represented By: | Erika Hannah Rosenblum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Josue Romero | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
