Shamilov v. City of New York et al
| Aleksandr Shamilov |
| New York City Department of Finance and City of New York |
| 1:2020cv10224 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Aleksandr Shamilov 1901 Avenue N. Apt. #3G Brooklyn, NY 11230, at, on 1/15/2021 Re: #6 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases), one or more summonses (only if you have paid the fee in person or if the judge has ordered that a summons be issued to you) - 2 copies of Summons(es) mailed. (aan)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York. (aan)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Finance. (aan)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF SERVICE: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action. Plaintiff's motion for permission to participate in electronic case filing, Dkt. 2, is granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue summonses as to Defendants City of New York and the New York City Department of Finance. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on each Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 2. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: #2 MOTION for Permission for Aleksandr Shamilov to participate in electronic case filing in this case. filed by Aleksandr Shamilov. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/14/2021) (jca) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Judge Colleen McMahon is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (bcu)
|
|
Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 12/21/2020, Receipt Number 465401270900. (jgl)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application to Aleksandr Shamilov at 1901 Avenue N., Apt. #3G, Brooklyn, NY 11230. (kh)
|
|
Filing 4
LETTER from A. Shamilov, dated 12/15/20 re: Please be advised that the complainant mailed out a USPS money order in the amount of $402.00 in case 20-cv-10224, and certified the postal mail. Please see images below(as indicated). Document filed by Aleksandr Shamilov.(sc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 1/14/2021. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 1/14/2021. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/15/2020) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (keb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING, re: for Permission for Aleksandr Shamilov to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Aleksandr Shamilov.(sc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of New York, New York City Department of Finance. Document filed by Aleksandr Shamilov. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit).(rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
