In Re: Henrique Rodriguez Guillen Application for and order directing discovery in aid of a foreign proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Case Number: 1:2020mc00102
Filed: June 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION & ORDER re: 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE INITIATING DOCUMENT - MOTION Application Under 28 USC 1782 for an Order Directing Discovery in Aid of Foreign Proceedings . (Filing Fee $ 47.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-18839757) filed by Henrique Rodriguez Guillen. The Petition satisfies the statutory requirements of § 1782, and the balance of the discretionary factors articulated in Intel Corp., 542 U.S. at 264 support granting the Petition. Accordingly, the Petition (ECF No. 1) is hereby GRANTED. Petitioner shall issue and serve a subpoena substantially in the form of the proposed subpoena (ECF No. 1-10; Exhibit 7) on Bank of America, along with a copy of this Opinion & Order. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/29/2020) (rj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Henrique Rodriguez Guillen Application for and order directing discovery in aid of a foreign proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?