Vale International S.A. et al
Case Number: 1:2020mc00199
Filed: July 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER: The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 145 and 147. Vale and Signa are directed to brief their respective positions on Signa's cost-shifting motion as follows: Signa's Motion to Shift Costs is due July 1, 2022. Vale's Opposition is due July 12, 2022. The parties' papers shall be limited to five (5) pages each. There shall be no replies. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 7/1/2022., Responses due by 7/12/2022) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 6/24/2022) (rro)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER: In light of Vale's request to preserve documents covered by the parties' protective order (ECF 69), counsel for Vale shall move to modify the protective order. Counsel for Vale and Fine Arts are directed to meet and confer regardi ng a potential resolution, and until further notice, the parties are further directed to preserve the documents at issue. The documents should be neither accessed nor destroyed at this time. If counsel for Fine Arts does not respond to Vale' s motion to modify the protective order, then Vale may move to modify the protective order as it sees fit. Counsel are directed to file their briefing on this issue in both this case and Vale S.A. v. BSG Resources Limited, No. 19-cv-3619 (VSB) (RWL). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 4/29/2022) (rro)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER granting 139 Letter Motion for Discovery; granting 142 Letter Motion for Discovery. In light of Vale's request to preserve documents covered by the parties' protective order (ECF 69), counsel for Vale shall move to modify th e protective order (ECF 69). Counsel for Vale and Perfectus are directed to meet and confer regarding a potential resolution, and until further notice, the parties are further directed to preserve the documents at issue. The documents should be n either accessed nor destroyed at this time. If counsel for Perfectus does not respond to Vale's motion to modify the protective order, then Vale may move to modify the protective order as it sees fit. Counsel are directed to file their briefing on this issue in both this case and Vale S.A. v. BSG Resources Limited, No. 19-cv-3619 (VSB) (RWL). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF 139. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 4/25/2022) (ate)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER: Pursuant to the directions given on the record at the November 10, 2021 conference, Perfectus shall complete productions by November 24, 2021. A joint status letter from Perfectus and Vale shall be filed by Vale on December 2, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 11/15/2021) (rro)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER The Status Conference scheduled for 3:30 p.m. EST on November 10, 2021 (ECF 104) is adjourned to 4:00 p.m. EST on November 10, 2021. Only counsel for Vale and Respondents Perfectus Real Estate Corp. (Perfectus) and Tarpley Belnord Corp. (Tarpl ey) are required to appear at the conference. The Court will not address the motion filed as ECF 93.Counsel for Vale shall appear in person at Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street. Contrary to the directions in ECF 104, counsel for Perfectus and Tarpley h as not indicated whether he will appear for the conference in person or by telephone. Counsel for Perfectus and Tarpley must file a letter with this information by November 9, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. EST. Counsel for Vale shall email a copy of this Order and ECF 104 to counsel for Perfectus and Tarpley and file proof of service by November 8, 2021. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on November 5, 2021) (rlf)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 97 Letter Motion to Compel. Application GRANTED. Nir Meir shall complete production of responsive documents by August 12, 2021. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in the Court imposing sanctions pursuant to applicable law. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 8/4/2021) (ate)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 88 granting 87 Letter Motion to Compel; granting 88 Letter Motion to Compel. ENDORSEMENT: Vale's unopposed motion to compel is hereby GRANTED. Respondents Perfectus Real Estate Corp. and Tarpley Belnord Corp. shall complete their production of responsive documents by June 29, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to close ECF 87 and ECF 88. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 6/22/2021) (rro)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL: Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.4 and the accompanying Declaration of Robert J. Cleary, Respondents Perfectus Real Estate Corp. and Tarpley Belnord Corp. (collectively, "Perfectus") respectfully request that Joseph Z. Hellerstein of Hellerstein & Co. with law offices at 11 Naftali Street, Suite 6, Modin, Israel, be substituted in place and in the stead of the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, with offices at Eleven Times Square, New York, New Yo rk 10036, as counsel of record for Perfectus in the above-captioned matter. This substitution is made with the knowledge and consent of Perfectus. SO ORDERED. Attorney Joseph Z. Hellerstein for Perfectus Real Estate Corp.,Joseph Z. Hellerstein for Tarpley Belnord Corp. added. Attorney Robert J. Cleary and William C. Komaroff terminated. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 4/26/2021) (rro)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER denying 63 Motion for Discovery. For the foregoing reasons, and having considered the factors of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, Respondents' motions to quash and associated requests to limit the subpoenas are DENIED. Respondents are hereby directed to respond to the subpoenas by February 5, 2021. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close ECF 63. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/29/2021) (ks)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 69 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 10/7/2020) (rro)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' joint letter and proposed protective order at ECF 64. Regarding the dispute over paragraph 8 of the proposed order, the parties are directed to consider the following language, which has bee n taken verbatim from the Hon. Lewis J. Liman's Model Protective Order; as set forth herein. By October 7, 2020, Parties are further directed to submit a joint letter informing the Court whether they will accept the proposed langu age above. If not accepted, Applicants as well as Respondents are directed to submit updated proposed language in their joint letter, and explain to the Court why their proposed language is better than Judge Liman's. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 9/24/2020) (mro)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782 denying as moot 22 Letter Motion for Oral Argument; granting 1 Motion for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings. Petitioner's discovery application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 is GRANTED. Petitioner is hereby authorized to serve its proposed subpoenas by July 24, 2020, if it has not served them already. (Se e ECF 23). If any Respondent seeks to file a motion to quash or a motion for a protective order, it must do so by July 31, 2020, and must follow this Court's Individual Practices in doing so. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close ECF 1. The Clerk is also directed to close ECF 22 as moot pursuant to this decision. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/20/20) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vale International S.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?