Sanchez v. BET Streaming LLC
Cristian Sanchez |
BET Streaming LLC |
1:2021cv01436 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Jesse M Furman |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff Cristian Sanchezs Complaint addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Mohammad B. Pathan dated 4/1/2021. The Application is GRANTED. Defendant shall have until May 3, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The deadline for the parties to file a joint letter and, if applicable, a proposed case management plan, in accordance with ECF No. 5, is hereby extended to May 17, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 8. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/01/2021) (ama) |
Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff Cristian Sanchezs Complaint addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Mohammad B. Pathan dated 4/1/2021. Document filed by BET Streaming LLC..(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mohammad Basim Pathan on behalf of BET Streaming LLC..(Pathan, Mohammad) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: BET Streaming LLC answer due 5/3/2021. (ama) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. BET Streaming LLC served on 3/12/2021, answer due 4/2/2021. Service was accepted by Corporation Service Company, via Drop Box. Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired customers and, thus, violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. 12181 et seq. In the Court's experience, the vast majority of cases involving such claims are resolved early often without even an initial pretrial conference. Accordingly, no later than the earlier of 100 days from the date of this Order or two weeks after Defendant appears in the case, the parties shall file a joint letter (unless Defendant has not appeared, in which case Plaintiff shall file the letter individually), not to exceed two pages. If any party believes that discovery is necessary or that an initial pretrial conference should be held, the parties shall, by the same date and in lieu of the aforementioned letter, file on ECF (1) a joint letter in accordance with Paragraph 2.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices and as described below; and (2) a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. To be clear, the deadline for either of the letters described above is just an outside deadline. That is, the parties may file the appropriate letter sooner and, indeed, should do so in the event that they believe the Court should hold a conference or allow discovery to commence. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/19/2021) (jca) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to BET Streaming LLC..(jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to BET Streaming LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BET Streaming LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23987800)Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sanchez v. BET Streaming LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BET Streaming LLC | |
Represented By: | Mohammad Basim Pathan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cristian Sanchez | |
Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.