Crabbe v. Secure Self Storage
| Emelinda Crabbe |
| Secure Self Storage |
| 1:2021cv01672 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the October 18, 2019 order in Crabbe v. Manhattan Mini Storage, ECF 1:19-CV-0013, 5, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/26/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On October 18, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in forma pauperis (IFP) in this Court without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Crabbe v. Manhattan Mini Storage, ECF 1:19-CV-0013, 5 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se civil action and seeks IFP status, but has not sought leave to file from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's October 18, 2019 order in Crabbe, 1:19-CV-0013. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/26/2021) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #3 Order of Dismissal, and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Emelinda Crabbe at General Delivery, 390 9th Ave., New York, NY 10001. (kh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Secure Self Storage. Document filed by Emelinda Crabbe. (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Emelinda Crabbe. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crabbe v. Secure Self Storage | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Secure Self Storage | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Emelinda Crabbe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
