Littman Krooks LLP v. New York City Department of Education
Littman Krooks LLP, D.G. individually and on behalf of E.P., T.H. individually and on behalf of D.T., E.V. individually and on behalf of E.M., M.L. individually and on behalf of A.L., R.O. individually and on behalf of A.O., N.C. individually and on behalf of E.C., E.A. individually and on behalf of N.M., J.J. individually and on behalf of J.R., S.R. individually and on behalf of B.B., Y.M. individually and on behalf of P.O., A.D. individually and on behalf of M.P., F.K. individually and on behalf of J.K., Y.B. individually and on behalf of J.T., D.H. individually and on behalf of E.H., A.V. individually and on behalf of T.R.S., F.L.S. individually and on behalf of F.L., T.S. individually and on behalf of D.H., J.P. individually and on behalf of A.G., G.J. individually and on behalf of J.M., R.M. individually and on behalf of A.M.W., M.M. individually and on behalf of F.J.L., G.G. individually and on behalf of R.S., M.A. individually and on behalf of R.A., E.V. individually and on behalf of A.M., G.C. individually and on behalf of A.J., R.G. individually and on behalf of A.G., J.P. individually and on behalf of J.R. and T.M. individually and on behalf of M.C. |
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
Marion Walsh and Ingrid Castillo |
1:2021cv02947 |
April 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Edgardo Ramos |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. § 1400 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER terminating #6 Letter Motion to Stay re: #6 LETTER MOTION to Stay , on consent, addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mart Bowe dated 05/11/2021. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to October 11, 2021. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion. Doc. 6. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/10/2021) (cf) |
Filing 6 LETTER MOTION to Stay , on consent, addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mart Bowe dated 05/11/2021. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Bowe, Martin) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: New York City Department of Education answer due 10/11/2021. (cf) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin John Bowe, Jr on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Bowe, Martin) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served on New York City Department of Education on April 20, 2021. Service was accepted by Betty Mazyck, Service Window Clerk. Document filed by Littman Krooks LLP..(Pal, Arshi) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education..(gp) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint,,,,,. Document filed by Littman Krooks LLP..(Pal, Arshi) |
ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Plaintiffs/Petitioners R.M. individually and on behalf of A.M.W., F.K. individually and on behalf of J.K., T.S. individually and on behalf of D.H., F.L.S. individually and on behalf of F.L., N.C. individually and on behalf of E.C., Marion Walsh, G.G. individually and on behalf of R.S., E.V. individually and on behalf of E.M., M.M. individually and on behalf of F.J.L., G.C. individually and on behalf of A.J., E.V. individually and on behalf of A.M., A.V. individually and on behalf of T.R.S., Ingrid Castillo, S.R. individually and on behalf of B.B., J.P. individually and on behalf of A.G., M.A. individually and on behalf of R.A., Y.B. individually and on behalf of J.T., Y.M. individually and on behalf of P.O., R.O. individually and on behalf of A.O., M.L. individually and on behalf of A.L., T.M. individually and on behalf of M.C., G.J. individually and on behalf of J.M., A.D. individually and on behalf of M.P., E.A. individually and on behalf of N.M., T.H. individually and on behalf of D.T., D.H. individually and on behalf of E.H., J.J. individually and on behalf of J.R., J.P. individually and on behalf of J.R., D.G. individually and on behalf of E.P., R.G. individually and on behalf of A.G. added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint,,,,,,.Document filed by R.M. individually and on behalf of A.M.W., F.K. individually and on behalf of J.K., T.S. individually and on behalf of D.H., F.L.S. individually and on behalf of F.L., N.C. individually and on behalf of E.C., Marion Walsh, G.G. individually and on behalf of R.S., E.V. individually and on behalf of E.M., M.M. individually and on behalf of F.J.L., G.C. individually and on behalf of A.J., E.V. individually and on behalf of A.M., A.V. individually and on behalf of T.R.S., Ingrid Castillo, S.R. individually and on behalf of B.B., J.P. individually and on behalf of A.G., M.A. individually and on behalf of R.A., Y.B. individually and on behalf of J.T., Y.M. individually and on behalf of P.O., R.O. individually and on behalf of A.O., M.L. individually and on behalf of A.L., T.M. individually and on behalf of M.C., G.J. individually and on behalf of J.M., A.D. individually and on behalf of M.P., E.A. individually and on behalf of N.M., T.H. individually and on behalf of D.T., D.H. individually and on behalf of E.H., J.J. individually and on behalf of J.R., J.P. individually and on behalf of J.R., D.G. individually and on behalf of E.P., R.G. individually and on behalf of A.G.. Related document: #1 Complaint,,,,,,..(Pal, Arshi) |
Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Arshi Pal. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (gp) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Arshi Pal re: Document No. #1 Complaint,,,,,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (gp) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Arshi Pal. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: New York City Department of Education. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly;. (gp) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILER ERROR COMPLAINT against NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24360755)Document filed by Littman Krooks LLP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A RA 178599-Decision, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B NM 175514-Decision, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C EC 172560-Decision, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D AJ 185672-Decision, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E MP 181299-Decision, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F AG 174234-Decision, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G EP 185558-Decision, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H RS 191157-Decision, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I EH 183234-Decision, #11 Exhibit Exhibit J DT 190803-Decision, #12 Exhibit Exhibit K JM 175487-Decision, #13 Exhibit Exhibit L JR 189818-Decision, #14 Exhibit Exhibit M JK 192754-Decision, #15 Exhibit Exhibit N A.L 175831- Amended Decision, #16 Exhibit Exhibit O PO 179253-Decision, #17 Exhibit Exhibit P AMW 192267-Decision, #18 Exhibit Exhibit Q FL185548-Corrected Decision, #19 Exhibit Exhibit R MC 190178-Decision, #20 Exhibit Exhibit S AO 182009-Decision, #21 Exhibit Exhibit T JR 185348-Decision, #22 Exhibit Exhibit U AG 166078- Decision, #23 Exhibit Exhibit V BB 178415- Decision, #24 Exhibit Exhibit W FL 190003-Decision, #25 Exhibit Exhibit X DH 171798-Decision, #26 Exhibit Exhibit Z EM 185546-Decision, #27 Exhibit Exhibit AA TS 192321-Decision, #28 Exhibit Exhibit BB JT 168813-Decision, #29 Exhibit Exhibit Y AM 185545-Decision).(Pal, Arshi) Modified on 4/7/2021 (gp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.