Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and Borinquen Court Associates, L.P. |
| Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv06364 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ct |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company. Document filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Borinquen Court Associates, L.P.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company. Document filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Borinquen Court Associates, L.P.. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Kohane, Dan) Modified on 9/23/2021 (dt). |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and without costs. Document filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Borinquen Court Associates, L.P.. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff...(Kohane, Dan) Modified on 9/23/2021 (dt). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Kohane, Dan. RE-FILE Document No. #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Re-file the document using the event type Notice of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Notices - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. When Re-Filing the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and you come to the question is this Notice of Voluntary dismissal pursuant to 41(a)(1)(A)(i), select Yes, because the Notice does cite to it. (dt) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Kohane, Dan to RE-FILE Document #8 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. Use the event type Notice of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Notices. (dt) |
Filing 7
ORDER re: #6 Summons Returned Executed, filed by Borinquen Court Associates, L.P., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. Accordingly, if Plaintiffs intend to seek a default judgment they are directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than September 27, 2021. If Plaintiffs fail to do so or otherwise demonstrate that they intend to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/26/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company served on 7/30/2021, answer due 8/20/2021. Service was accepted by DFS. Document filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company; Borinquen Court Associates, L.P...(Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ryan P Maxwell on behalf of Borinquen Court Associates, L.P., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company..(Maxwell, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Borinquen Court Associates, L.P., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company..(Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24845412)Document filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Borinquen Court Associates, L.P...(Kohane, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
