Liu v. Mayorkas et al
Jinying Liu |
Sec. DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Dir. USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Director Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2021cv07888 |
September 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John G Koeltl |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Byars on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Byars, Michael) |
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Jinying Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Ur M. Jaddou. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Service was attempted on 09/24/2021. Document filed by Jinying Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Service was attempted on 09/24/2021. Document filed by Jinying Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas.Document filed by Jinying Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney David Rodkin to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed by the attorney. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Rodkin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jinying Liu; Alejandro Mayorkas; Ur M. Jaddou. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25091628).Document filed by Jinying Liu..(Rodkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.