Crumwell v. Casey M. Kaplan, Inc.
Denise Crumwell |
Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. |
1:2021cv08424 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Edgardo Ramos |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT DECREE: This Consent Decree is entered into as of the Effective Date, as defined below in Paragraph 10, by and between the following parties: Plaintiff, Denise Crumwell ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. ("Defendant"). Plaintiff and Defendant shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as, the "Parties" for the purposes and on the terms specified herein. THE COURT, HAVING CONSIDERED the pleadings, law, underlying facts and having reviewed this proposed Consent Decree, FINDS AS FOLLOWS: This Court has personal jurisdiction over Plaintiff and Defendant for the purposes of this lawsuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331; The provisions of this Consent Decree shall be binding upon the Parties; Entry of this Consent Decree is in the public interest; This Consent Decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Defendant of any of the allegations contained in the Complaint or any otherpleading in this lawsuit, nor does it constitute any finding of liability against Defendant; The Plaintiff is acting as a private attorney general in bringing this lawsuit and enforcing the ADA; and This Consent Decree shall be deemed as adjudicating, once and for all, the merits of each and every claim, matter, and issue that was alleged, or could have been alleged by Plaintiff based on, or arising out of, or in connection with, the allegations in the Complaint. NOW THEREFORE, the Court approves the Consent Decree and in doing so specifically adopts it and makes it an Order of the Court. DONE AND ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/12/2021) (ama) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER. Document filed by Casey M. Kaplan, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement With Prejudice. Document filed by Denise Crumwell..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Joseph J. DiPalma dated November 4, 2021. Defendant's request for an extension of time to December 10, 2021 to respond to the Complaint is granted. It is SO ORDERED. Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. answer due 12/10/2021. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/04/2021) (ama) |
Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Joseph J. DiPalma dated November 4, 2021. Document filed by Casey M. Kaplan, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James DiPalma on behalf of Casey M. Kaplan, Inc...(DiPalma, Joseph) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. served on 10/20/2021, answer due 11/10/2021. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, NYS SOS, Agent. Document filed by Denise Crumwell..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Denise Crumwell..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Casey M. Kaplan, Inc...(jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Casey M. Kaplan, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Denise Crumwell..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Casey M. Kaplan, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25185356)Document filed by Denise Crumwell..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crumwell v. Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Denise Crumwell | |
Represented By: | Michael A. LaBollita |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Casey M. Kaplan, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Joseph James DiPalma |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.