Tavarez-Vargas v. Cascade Designs, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carmen Tavarez-Vargas
Defendant: Cascade Designs, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv09942
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle of this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty days. All filing deadlines and conference dates are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/15/2022) (vfr)
March 4, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 3/7/2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (brl)
February 11, 2022 Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Amanda L. Van Hoose Garofalo dated February 11, 2022. Document filed by Cascade Designs, Inc...(Van Hoose Garofalo, Amanda)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 2/14/2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (brl)
January 31, 2022 Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Amanda L. Van Hoose Garofalo dated January 31, 2022. Document filed by Cascade Designs, Inc...(Van Hoose Garofalo, Amanda)
January 12, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Cascade Designs, Inc. served on 12/17/2021, answer due 1/7/2022. Service was accepted by Mats Nygren, Governor/Person authorized to accept service. Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time: GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 1/28/2022. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (brl)
January 5, 2022 Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Amanda L. Van Hoose Garofalo dated January 5, 2022. Document filed by Cascade Designs, Inc...(Van Hoose Garofalo, Amanda)
November 30, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Edward Y. Kroub. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Bronx. (vf)
November 29, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cascade Designs, Inc...(gp)
November 29, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp)
November 29, 2021 Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp)
November 29, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (gp)
November 24, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Cascade Designs, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward)
November 24, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kroub, Edward)
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cascade Designs, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25381730)Document filed by Carmen Tavarez-Vargas..(Kroub, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tavarez-Vargas v. Cascade Designs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Tavarez-Vargas
Represented By: Edward Y. Kroub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cascade Designs, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda L Van Hoose Garofalo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?