Uddin et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Shamsu Uddin, Nargish Akter, Md Faysal Mahmud Peyam and Sadika Afnan |
| Secretary, D.H.S. Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 1:2021cv10362 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/14/2022) (jca)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/28/2022) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Ur Mendoza Jaddou answer due 4/9/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas answer due 4/9/2022. (ama) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from SAUSA Jacqueline Roman dated 01/27/2022. Document filed by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/17/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by February 4, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/17/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/17/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (vf) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Rodkin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Shamsu Uddin, Sadika Afnan, Md Faysal Mahmud Peyam, Nargish Akter. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Sadika Afnan, Nargish Akter, Md Faysal Mahmud Peyam, Shamsu Uddin..(Rodkin, David) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mayorkas, Alejandro, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Sadika Afnan, Nargish Akter, Md Faysal Mahmud Peyam, Shamsu Uddin..(Rodkin, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rodkin, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25423408).Document filed by Shamsu Uddin, Sadika Afnan, Md Faysal Mahmud Peyam, Nargish Akter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit).(Rodkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
