136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. Razinski et al
| 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC |
| Alexander Razinski, Tanya Razinski and Invar International Holdings Inc. |
| 1:2021cv11076 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John F Keenan |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #10 Complaint against Invar International Holdings Inc., Alexander Razinski, Tanya Razinski.Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC. Related document: #10 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Master Agreement, #2 Exhibit Invar Guarantee).(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Mailed a Notice of Case Reassignment to Alexander Razinski; Tanya Razinski at P.O. Box 8184 White Plains, NY 10602. (aea)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John F. Keenan. Judge Louis L. Stanton is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
|
|
Filing 17
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE of Notices of Pro Se Appearance, Answer to Complaint & Counterclaim, served on 136 Field Point Circle Holding Co., LLC on 2/2/22. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Alexander Razinski, Tanya Razinski. (sc)
|
|
Filing 16
LETTER addressed to Judge Louis L. Stanton from A. Razinski and T. Razinski dated 2/2/22 re: MOTION LETTER TO REQUEST DISJOINMENT OF DEFENDANT INVAR INTERNATIONAL HOLDING, INC. IN THE MATTER OF 136 FIELD POINT CIRCLE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC V. ALEXANDER RAZINSKI ET AL. Document filed by Alexander Razinski, Tanya Razinski.(sc)
|
|
Filing 15
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT & COUNTERCLAIM, re: to #10 Complaint., COUNTERCLAIM against 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC. Document filed by Tanya Razinski, Alexander Razinski.(sc)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO SE by Tanya Razinski. (sc)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO SE, by Alexander Razinski. (sc)
|
|
Filing 12
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Invar International Holdings Inc. served on 1/4/2022, answer due 1/25/2022. Service was accepted by Katie Bush, Sec. of State Employee. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 11
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint, Complaint. Alexander Razinski served on 1/12/2022, answer due 2/2/2022; Tanya Razinski served on 1/12/2022, answer due 2/2/2022. Service was accepted by John Doe. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 10
COMPLAINT against Invar International Holdings Inc., Alexander Razinski, Tanya Razinski. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Master Agreement).(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alexander Razinski..(gp)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tanya Razinski..(gp)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Invar International Holdings Inc...(gp)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Mitchell John Baker to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): not all the party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (gp)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (gp)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp)
|
|
Filing 6
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Invar International Holdings, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Tanya Razinski, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alexander Razinski, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC..(Baker, Mitchell)
|
|
Filing 1
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT against Invar International Holdings Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25511988)Document filed by 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Master Agreement).(Baker, Mitchell) Modified on 12/28/2021 (gp).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
