Ankura Consulting Group, LLC v. Mortazavi
Plaintiff: Ankura Consulting Group, LLC
Defendant: Mohammad Mortazavi
Case Number: 1:2022cv02385
Filed: March 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S Broderick
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying #23 Letter Motion for Oral Argument. APPLICATION DENIED. The Court will order oral argument shall it deem it necessary. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 5/18/2022) (kv)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Steven G. Yudin, Esq. dated May 17, 2022. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Reply Declarations served on Mohammad Mortazavi on May 16, 2022. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 REPLY AFFIRMATION of Steve Huffines in Support re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court .. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPLY AFFIRMATION of Steven G. Yudin in Support re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court .. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Emails, #2 Exhibit Letter to Court).(Yudin, Steven)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court ., #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue. MOTION to Transfer Case for Improper Venue or the Convenience of the Parties. . Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Marisella T. Prada ISO Opposition to Cross Motion and Reply).(Prada, Marisella)
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION EXTENDING FILING DATES FOR MOTION AND CROSS-MOTION, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff ANKURA CONSULTING GROUP, LLC (Plaintiff) and defendant MOHAMMAD MORTAZAVI ("Defendant"), as follows: 1. On March 31, 2022, defendant MOHAMMAD MORTAZAVI ("Defendant") filed and served his motion to dismiss or in the alternative, to transfer venue ("Motion to Transfer"). 2. By stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff's response date was extended to April 25, 2022. On April 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed and served its opposition and also a cross motion for remand to state court ("Cross-Motion to Remand"). 3. The current reply date for Defendant for his Motion to Transfer is May 2, 2022, and the opposition for the Cross-Motion to Remand is May 9, 2022. 4. The parties believe it would be in the best interest for Defendant to file its reply and opposition in one motion. 5. Defendant's time to file a reply on the Motion to Transfer is hereby extended, on consent between the parties to May 9, 2022, so that Defendant can file the reply on the Motion to Transfer and opposition to the Cross-Motion to Remand together. 6. Plaintiff's time to file a reply on the Cross-Motion to Remand is hereby extended, on consent between the parties to May 16, 2022. 7. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile, conformed emails or electronic signatures shall be deemed originals for all purposes. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 5/9/2022, Replies due by 5/16/2022.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 5/2/2022) (kv)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE of of STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING FILING DATES FOR MOTION AND CROSS-MOTION re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court ., #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue. MOTION to Transfer Case for Improper Venue or the Convenience of the Parties.. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi..(Prada, Marisella)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF REDESIGNATION TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The above entitled action has been redesignated to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. Please note that this is a reassignment of the designation only. (sac)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECLARATION of Cherie Schaible in Support re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court .. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DECLARATION of Steven G. Yudin in Support re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court .. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court . . Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service).(Yudin, Steven)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Steven Yudin to RE-FILE Document #13 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court . ERROR(S): Supporting documents are filed separately, each receiving their own document #. Refile the multiple Supporting Documents found under the Event Type - Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents, then link them to the #12 MOTION. (db)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILER ERROR - CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court . Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support of cross-motion and in opposition to motion, #2 Declaration in support of cross-motion and in opposition to motion, #3 Memorandum of Law in support of cross-motion and in opposition to motion, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service).(Yudin, Steven) Modified on 4/25/2022 (db).
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CROSS MOTION to Remand to State Court . Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATION OF NEW RESPONSE DATE FOR PLAINTIFF REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE; OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE FOR IMPROPER VENUE OR FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE PARTIES: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff ANKURA CONSULTING GROUP, LLC and defendant MOHAMMAD MORTAZAVI, as follows: 1. March 31, 2022, defendant MOHAMMAD MORTAZAVI ("Defendant") filed and served his motion to dismiss or in the alternative, to transfer venue ("Motion"). 2. The response due date for Plaintiff to file its response is April 14, 2022. 3. Plaintiff's time to respond to the Motion in this action is hereby extended, on consent between the parties to April 25, 2022. 4. Defendant's reply to the Motion in this action is hereby extended, on consent between the parties to May 2, 2022. 5. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile, conformed emails or electronic signatures shall be deemed originals for all purposes. ( Responses due by 4/25/2022, Replies due by 5/2/2022.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/12/2022) (tg)
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of of Stipulation of New Response Date for Plaintiff re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue. MOTION to Transfer Case for Improper Venue or the Convenience of the Parties.. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi..(Prada, Marisella)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of NOTICE OF NEW RESPONSE DATE FOR PLAINTIFF REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE; OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE FOR IMPROPER VENUE OR FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE PARTIES re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue. MOTION to Transfer Case for Improper Venue or the Convenience of the Parties.. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi..(Prada, Marisella)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue.( Responses due by 4/7/2022), MOTION to Transfer Case for Improper Venue or the Convenience of the Parties. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Mortazavi ISO Mtn., #2 Text of Proposed Order).(Prada, Marisella)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Steven G. Yudin, Esq. dated March 30, 2022 re: Proposed motion. Document filed by Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Yudin on behalf of Ankura Consulting Group, LLC..(Yudin, Steven)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 LETTER addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Marisella Prada, counsel for Defendant Mohammad Mortazavi dated March 30, 2022 re: Request for a Hearing Date for: Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi..(Prada, Marisella)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marisella Prada on behalf of Mohammad Mortazavi..(Prada, Marisella)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #2 MOTION for Marisella T. Prada to Appear Pro Hac Vice Notice of Motion. The motion of Marisella Prada of Prada & Associates, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/30/2022) (jca)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2 MOTION for Marisella T. Prada to Appear Pro Hac Vice Notice of Motion. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25926166. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (vba)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Marisella T. Prada to Appear Pro Hac Vice Notice of Motion. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-25926166. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Marisella Prada ISO Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Prada, Marisella)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: Check $402.00 processed by the Finance Department on 3/28/2022, Receipt Number 465401296072. (jcf)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 656835/2021. Document filed by Mohammad Mortazavi. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Adverse Party, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (sac)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ankura Consulting Group, LLC v. Mortazavi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ankura Consulting Group, LLC
Represented By: Steven Yudin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohammad Mortazavi
Represented By: Marisella Prada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?