Kukic v. Melecio
| Dilber Kukic |
| Phil Melecio |
| 1:2022cv02684 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Stewart D Aaron |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO ANSWER, Having determined under 28 U.S.C. 2254 that this petition (ECF No. 3) should not be summarily denied, it is hereby ORDERED, as follows: 1.No later than June 13, 2022, Respondent must file and serve: (1) an answer, motion or other response to the petition, and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. 2. No later than July 13, 2022, Petitioner may file and serve any reply papers. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order, the petition and its accompanying exhibits (ECF No. 3) on the Attorney General of the State of New York and on the District Attorney of New York County by electronic means through the use of the court's CM/ECF system. SO ORDERED. Phil Melecio answer due on 6/13/2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/13/2022) (kv) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
| Filing 5 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Mark M. Baker dated April 12, 2022 re: pending habeas petition. Document filed by Dilber Kukic..(Baker, Mark) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Habeas Corpus. Referred to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/5/2022) (ks)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. County of Conviction: New York. Document filed by Dilber Kukic. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit).(Baker, Mark) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Mark M. Baker to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; PDF should consist of Pleading and supporting documents only; Memorandum of Law is its own separate docket entry. Re-file the pleading using the event type Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 4/11/2022. (sj) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Baker, Mark) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. County of Conviction: New York. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25947052)Document filed by Dilber Kukic. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit, #4 memorandum of law).(Baker, Mark) Modified on 4/4/2022 (sj). |
| ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents Phil Melecio added. Party added pursuant to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,.Document filed by Phil Melecio. Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,..(Baker, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kukic v. Melecio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dilber Kukic | |
| Represented By: | Mark M. Baker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Phil Melecio | |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE-GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
