Jain v. DeJoy
| Devendra Kumar Jain |
| Louis DeJoy |
| 1:2022cv02751 |
| April 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Louis DeJoy, served on 5/4/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. Service was made by Mail to Louis Dejoy, Postmaster General(U.S.P.S.), 475 Lefant Plaza, NW, Wash., DC 20260. Document filed by Devendra Kumar Jain. (sc) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 8. Mailed to: Devendra Kumar Jain 1053 N 2 ST New Hyde Park, NY 11040-2836. (dsh) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Dana Walsh Kumar dated 05/19/2022. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 6. SO ORDERED. #1 Complaint. Louis DeJoy answer due 7/6/2022. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/20/2022) (vfr)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Letter Motion (ECF No. 6) served on PLAINTIFF on 05/19/2022. Service was made by CERTIFIED MAIL. Document filed by Louis DeJoy..(Kumar, Dana) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Dana Walsh Kumar dated 05/19/2022. Document filed by Louis DeJoy..(Kumar, Dana) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dana Walsh Kumar on behalf of Louis DeJoy..(Kumar, Dana) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David E. Farber on behalf of Louis DeJoy..(Farber, David) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 04/07/2022, Receipt Number 465401296545. (stt) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Louis DeJoy. (dsh) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE by Devendra Kumar Jain. (sc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis DeJoy. Document filed by Devendra Kumar Jain. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jain v. DeJoy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Devendra Kumar Jain | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Louis DeJoy | |
| Represented By: | Dana Walsh Kumar |
| Represented By: | David E. Farber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
