Lantz v. Liebenberg et al
Plaintiff: PERICLES LANTZ
Defendant: CAROLINE LIEBENBERG, WILHELM LIEBENBERG, JOHN DOE, JONATHAN E MOSKIN, John Does 1-6 and Jonathan E. Moskin
Case Number: 1:2022cv04855
Filed: June 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Barry G. Felder on behalf of Jonathan E. Moskin..(Felder, Barry)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. GRANTED. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/2/2022) (kv)
August 1, 2022 Filing 16 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Joint Letter & CMP addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Edward S. Stone dated August 1, 2022. Document filed by Pericles Lantz..(Stone, Edward)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by August 8, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/30/2022) (kv)
June 13, 2022 Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jonathan E. Moskin..(lal)
June 13, 2022 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Caroline Leibenberg..(lal)
June 13, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Wilhelm Liebenberg..(lal)
June 10, 2022 Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Stone, Edward)
June 10, 2022 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jonathan E. Moskin, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Pericles Lantz..(Stone, Edward)
June 10, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Caroline Liebenberg, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Pericles Lantz..(Stone, Edward)
June 10, 2022 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wilhelm Liebenberg, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Pericles Lantz..(Stone, Edward)
June 10, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Edward S. Stone to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Multiple citizenships for the plaintiff and defendant were selected. Choose one for the first listed plaintiff and first listed defendant. Civil cover sheet was not signed. (pc)
June 10, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Edward S. Stone. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: JOHN DOE, CAROLINE LIEBENBERG, WILHELM LIEBENBERG, JONATHAN E MOSKIN, PERICLES LANTZ. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly;. (pc)
June 10, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
June 10, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Edward S. Stone. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc)
June 10, 2022 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
June 10, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
June 10, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Edward S. Stone to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons, #2 Request for Issuance of Summons, #4 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; Summons PDF is corrupted and cannot be modified;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc)
June 9, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Stone, Edward)
June 9, 2022 Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jonathan E. Moskin, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by PERICLES LANTZ..(Stone, Edward) Modified on 6/10/2022 (pc).
June 9, 2022 Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Caroline Liebenberg, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by PERICLES LANTZ..(Stone, Edward) Modified on 6/10/2022 (pc).
June 9, 2022 Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wilhelm Liebenberg, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by PERICLES LANTZ..(Stone, Edward) Modified on 6/10/2022 (pc).
June 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE, CAROLINE LIEBENBERG, WILHELM LIEBENBERG, JONATHAN E MOSKIN. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26264729)Document filed by PERICLES LANTZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CSI Panama, #2 Exhibit B - Emails, #3 Errata C - Loan Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - IP & Invoices, #5 Exhibit E - Letter to Moskin, #6 Exhibit F - Letter from Moskin).(Stone, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lantz v. Liebenberg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PERICLES LANTZ
Represented By: Edward S. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLINE LIEBENBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILHELM LIEBENBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JONATHAN E MOSKIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-6
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan E. Moskin
Represented By: Barry G. Felder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?