Davis v. Innovate Corp.
| Harold Davis |
| Innovate Corp. dba Azteca America doing business as Azteca America and Innovate Corp. doing business as Azteca America |
| 1:2022cv06642 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Innovate Corp. served on 8/31/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. Service was accepted by Colleen Banahan, Authorized Agent in the Office of the Secretary of State. Document filed by Harold Davis..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (sj) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Innovate Corp.. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Westchester. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Philip M. Halpern is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Innovate Corp. dba Azteca America, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Harold Davis..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Innovate Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26505473)Document filed by Harold Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement).(Dunne, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
