Kong v. Mayorkas et al
| Weijing Kong |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Dir. USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Director Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray, Merrick B. Garland, Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou, Director Christopher A. Wray and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2022cv07488 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie Figueredo |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Weijing Kong. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rahman, Meer) |
Filing 11
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs or fees to any pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Application granted. The parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, under F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1) (A)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/18/2022) (tg)
|
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Meer Rahman. RE-FILE Document No. #10 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal,,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the voluntary dismissal is against was/were selected;. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned signature image) PDF. (nd) |
| Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Weijing Kong and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Weijing Kong. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rahman, Meer) Modified on 10/18/2022 (nd). |
| Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from SAUSA Jacqueline Roman dated September 30, 2022 re: joint letter declining referral to the Magistrate Judge. Document filed by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this order file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this order (and also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf). The executed form should be filed on ECF as a "Proposed Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge," and be described using the "Proposed Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge" filing event in accordance with ECF Rule 13.27. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this order advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/18/2022) (va)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacqueline Roman on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray..(Roman, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). All such motions: Referred to Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/2/22) (yv)
|
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray..(jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Meer Md. Mizanur Rahman. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Alejandro N. Mayorkas; Ur M. Jaddou; Patricia A. Menges; Christopher A. Wray; Merrick B. Garland. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray, Merrick B. Garland, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Weijing Kong..(Rahman, Meer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meer Md. Mizanur Rahman on behalf of Weijing Kong..(Rahman, Meer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rahman, Meer) |
| Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, Christopher A. Wray (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26624994).Document filed by Weijing Kong..(Rahman, Meer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
