Duran v. Autozoners, LLC et al
Jofeny Duran |
Autozoners, LLC, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc. |
1:2022cv07817 |
September 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Lorna G Schofield |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Bronx. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1Z E22 E53 37 1007 541 9 on 10/28/2022. (ama) |
Filing 10 ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the matter is remanded to state court. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Pursuant to section 1447(c), the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a certified copy of this Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/27/2022) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Jofeny Duran..(Gangat, Mohammed) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #7 Amended Complaint against Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozone, Inc., Autozoners, LLC with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Jofeny Duran. Related document: #7 Amended Complaint..(Gangat, Mohammed) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Mohammed Ahmed Gangat re: Document No. #7 Amended Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (vf) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozone, Inc., Autozoners, LLC with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Jofeny Duran..(Gangat, Mohammed) |
Filing 6 ORDER: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that a telephonic conference will be held on November 16, 2022 at 4:00p.m. The parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code 558-3333. The telephonic conference is public, and the time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. The parties shall ensure they are all dialed into the conference call by the appointed conference time, as further set forth. Initial Conference set for 11/16/2022 at 04:00 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/13/2022) (mml) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mohammed Ahmed Gangat on behalf of Jofeny Duran..(Gangat, Mohammed) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger from Michael D. Billok dated 9/19/2022. SO ORDERED. Autozone Stores, Inc. answer due 10/20/2022; Autozone, Inc. answer due 10/20/2022; Autozoners, LLC answer due 10/20/2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 9/19/2022) (mml) |
Filing 3 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger from Michael D. Billok dated 9/19/2022. Document filed by Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozone, Inc., Autozoners, LLC..(Billok, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Billok, Michael) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael David Billok. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Jofeny Duran. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Michael David Billok. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 811794/2022E. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26671145).Document filed by Autozone Stores, Inc., Autozoners, LLC, Autozone, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Affidavit of Service AutoZoners, LLC, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Affidavit of Service AutoZone, Inc., #4 Exhibit Ex. 4 - Affidavit of Service AutoZone Stores, Inc.).(Billok, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.