The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
| The New York Times Company and Matthieu Aikins |
| United States Department of Defense and United States Department of State |
| 1:2022cv09448 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Al-Amyn Shiraz Sumar on behalf of Matthieu Aikins, The New York Times Company..(Sumar, Al-Amyn) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/30/2022) (kv)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lucas Estlund Issacharoff on behalf of United States Department of Defense, United States Department of State..(Issacharoff, Lucas) |
| Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Alyssa B. O'Gallagher dated November 30, 2022. Document filed by United States Department of Defense, United States Department of State..(O'Gallagher, Alyssa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alyssa O'Gallagher on behalf of United States Department of Defense, United States Department of State..(O'Gallagher, Alyssa) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: United States Department of Defense answer due 1/13/2023; United States Department of State answer due 1/13/2023. (kv) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States Department of State..(pc) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States Department of Defense..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Matthieu Aikins, The New York Times Company..(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to United States Department of State, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Matthieu Aikins, The New York Times Company..(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to United States Department of Defense, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Matthieu Aikins, The New York Times Company..(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(McCraw, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Defense, United States Department of State. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26919253)Document filed by The New York Times Company, Matthieu Aikins..(McCraw, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
