Voltstar Technologies, Inc. v. Adorama Inc.
| Voltstar Technologies, Inc. |
| Adorama Inc. |
| 1:2022cv10167 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Conrad Michael Olear on behalf of Adorama Inc...(Olear, Conrad) |
Filing 14
ORDER: THE REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BY JANUARY 30, 2023. SO ORDERED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken) (Text Only Order) (lar)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Adorama Inc...(Olear, Conrad) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Adorama Inc. served on 12/9/2022, answer due 12/30/2022. Service was accepted by Jerry Joseph, Registered Agent. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc...(Dunne, Joseph) |
| CASE DECLINED AS NOT RELATED. Case referred as related to 22-cv-08429 and declined by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr and returned to wheel for assignment. (aea) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:22-cv-08249. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc...(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (vf) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Adorama Inc.. (vf) |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - ERROR - STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:22-cv-08249. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc...(Dunne, Joseph) Modified on 12/1/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Adorama Inc.. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Claim Chart #1, #3 Exhibit 3 - Claim Chart #2, #4 Exhibit 4 - Claim Chart #3).(Dunne, Joseph) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PATENT FORM. Notice to Attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne re: Document No. #3 AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the Date Filed field on the AO 120 Patent/Trademark form was not completed by the attorney. Do not re-file the form. The Court has corrected the deficiency/deficiencies. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. as possibly related to 1:22-cv-08429. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Related Case Section Docket Number Error. Docket number reflected on Civil Cover Sheet does not correspond to Related Case Form. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE RELATED CASE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne, for non compliance with Local Rule 13 of the Division of Business Among Judges. Attorney must electronically file the Related Case Statement. Use the event type Statement of Relatedness found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RELATED CASE STATEMENT. Notice to attorney Joseph Anthony Dunne to RE-FILE Document No. #7 Statement of Relatedness. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the related case number entered in ECF docket entry does not correspond to to the attached PDF. Enter the Case Number when prompted in ECF. Re-file the document using the event type Statement of Relatedness found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer - enter the related case number when prompted - and attach the correct PDF. (vf) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Adorama Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc...(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Dunne, Joseph) Modified on 12/1/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 3 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Dunne, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Adorama Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc...(Dunne, Joseph) Modified on 12/1/2022 (vf). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against Voltstar Technologies, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27021930)Document filed by Voltstar Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Claim Chart #1, #3 Exhibit 3 - Claim Chart #2, #4 Exhibit 4 - Claim Chart #3).(Dunne, Joseph) Modified on 12/1/2022 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Voltstar Technologies, Inc. v. Adorama Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Voltstar Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Dunne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adorama Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Conrad Michael Olear |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
