Martinez v. Parkash 2125 LLC et al
| Rolando Lopez Martinez |
| Parkash 2125 LLC, Anurag Parkash and Ved Parkash |
| 1:2023cv05097 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FIRST MEDIATION CONFERENCE. Mediation Conference scheduled for 8/29/2023 at 10:00 AM in telephone or video conference.(mnp) |
| NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 8/7/2023.(sge) |
Filing 5
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 7/13/2023. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/10/2019) (sge)
|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Ved Parkash waiver sent on 6/20/2023, answer due 8/21/2023; Anurag Parkash waiver sent on 6/20/2023, answer due 8/21/2023; Parkash 2125 LLC waiver sent on 6/20/2023, answer due 8/21/2023. Document filed by Ved Parkash; Anurag Parkash; Parkash 2125 LLC..(Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Scott Johnson on behalf of Anurag Parkash, Ved Parkash, Parkash 2125 LLC..(Johnson, Kevin) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael Steven Samuel. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Bronx; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Samuel, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anurag Parkash, Ved Parkash, Parkash 2125 LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27884946)Document filed by Rolando Lopez Martinez..(Samuel, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
