Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
| Jimmy Avila |
| ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas, PMP, New York City Field Office of Mental Health, Kim F. Ben-Atar, NYC Adult Protective Services, Thomas Glenoy and 1412 College Avenue LLC |
| 1:2024cv00884 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: . Mailed to: Jimmy Avila 1412 College Avenue Apt. 1B Bronx, NY 10456. (nb) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 2/8/2024) (vn)
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jimmy Avila. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1412 College Avenue LLC, ACACIA Network, Inc., Kim F. Ben-Atar, Aja Douglas, Thomas Glenoy, Trevor Griffiths, NYC Adult Protective Services, New York City Field Office of Mental Health, PMP. Document filed by Jimmy Avila. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
