Forstl v. Morgan Creek Capital Management, LLC et al
| Michael Forstl |
| Mark Yusko and Morgan Creek Capital Management, LLC |
| 1:2024cv05691 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mark Yusko, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by Michael Forstl..(Bonthuis, Mari) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Morgan Creek Capital Management, LLC, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by Michael Forstl..(Bonthuis, Mari) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bonthuis, Mari) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Morgan Creek Capital Management, LLC, Mark Yusko. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29665099)Document filed by Michael Forstl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Term Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Amendment No. 3 to Operating Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Fee Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Amendment No. 4 to Operating Agreement, #5 Exhibit E - August 2017 Appendix A, #6 Exhibit F - February 2018 Appendix A, #7 Exhibit G - Q4 2020 Revenue Summary, #8 Exhibit H - Q2 2021 Revenue Summary, #9 Exhibit I - Original 2021 Q3 Revenues, #10 Exhibit J - Amended 2021 Q3 Revenues, #11 Exhibit K - February 2022 Amendment).(Bonthuis, Mari) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
