Buxbaum v. Kallen
Plaintiff: Michael Buxbaum
Defendant: Edward Kallen
Case Number: 1:2025cv00602
Filed: January 18, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2025 Request for Copies/Transcripts/Docket Sheet Processed: Mailed copy of Docket ShMichael Buxbaum 7491 N Federal Hwy 125 Boca Raton, FL 33487 eet on 2/25/2025. (nb)
February 21, 2025 Filing 5 LETTER from Michael Buxbaum dated 2/21/2025 re: A request is being made Pursuant to Rule 15 Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (a)(2) "(2) Other Amendments. In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." that the amended complaint and Request for Injunction be docketed in the docket sheet. Document filed by Michael Buxbaum..(nd)
January 30, 2025 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Michael Buxbaum 7491 N Federal Hwy 125 Boca Raton, FL 33487. (anc)
January 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL.... On January 23, 2025, the court received a letter from Plaintiff in which he requests to withdraw this action. (ECF 3.) The Court grants Plaintiff's request. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/27/2025) (vfr)
January 23, 2025 Filing 3 LETTER addressed to Clerk of the Court from Michael Buxbaum dated 1/23/2025 re: Kindly withdraw my Complaint for a Civil Case as the Writ of Prohibition is no longer necessary since Edward Kallen is not a court attorney for the NYS Supreme Court. Document filed by Michael Buxbaum. (jjc)
January 23, 2025 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2. Mailed to: Michael Buxbaum 7491 N Federal Hwy 125 Boca Raton, FL 33487. (ak)
January 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may #consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for #permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 03/18/2024) (sac)
January 22, 2025 CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see #Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information. (sac)
January 22, 2025 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba)
January 18, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward Kallen. Document filed by Michael Buxbaum. (sac)
January 18, 2025 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buxbaum v. Kallen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Buxbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Kallen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?