People of the State of New York, by Letitia James v. DailyPay, Inc.
People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York |
DailyPay, Inc. |
1:2025cv03439 |
April 25, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Meredith Osborn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-30990438. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by DailyPay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Declaration of Meredith Osborn, #2 Exhibit - California Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit - Massachusetts Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice).(Osborn, Meredith) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yiqing Shi on behalf of DailyPay, Inc...(Shi, Yiqing) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent DailyPay Holdings, Inc. for DailyPay, Inc.. Document filed by DailyPay, Inc...(Asner, Marcus) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Asner, Marcus) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 25-CV-2849. Document filed by DailyPay, Inc...(Asner, Marcus) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 154851/2025. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30987530).Document filed by DailyPay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 1, #2 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 2, #3 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 3, #4 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 4, #5 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 5, #6 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 6, #7 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 7, #8 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 8, #9 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 9, #10 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 10, #11 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 11, #12 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 12, #13 Exhibit A Verified Petition filed in State Court Part 13).(Asner, Marcus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: People of the State of New York, by Letitia James v. DailyPay, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DailyPay, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Marcus Aaron Asner |
Represented By: | Yiqing Shi |
Represented By: | Meredith Blagden Osborn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.