Keebler v. Rath
||April 12, 2004
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||White Plains Office
||Stephen C. Robinson
||Lisa Margaret Smith
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 26, 2009
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS:It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Smith' Report dated February 24,2009, is adopted as the decision of the Court.Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the C ourt is respectfully directed to terminated the pending motion.(Doc.37.)A status conference will be held before this Court on April 9,2009 at 9:30 am. for 42 Report and Recommendations SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/26/2009) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies.(rj)
|March 24, 2009
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 37 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by James Rath, 42 Report and Recommendations It is hereby Ordered that Magistrate Judge Smith's Report dated February 24, 2009, is adopted as the decision of the Court. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion. (Doc. 37.) So Ordered: (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on March 23, 2009) "The Clerk's Office has mailed copies".(ll)
|February 24, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment. filed by James Rath Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on February 24, 2009) (ll)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?