Berry v. Village of Millbrook
| Robert D. Berry |
| Village of Millbrook |
| 7:2009cv04234 |
| April 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Dutchess |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
OPINION & ORDER: Marchinkowski's and Locke's Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motions, enter judgment for Marchinkowski and Locke, and to close this case. (Dkt. Nos. 126, 135.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/30/2015) (lnl)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER re: 44 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Village of Millbrook and 42 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charles Locke and The Dutchess County District Attorney's Office. For the reasons stated herein, the motions to dismiss of Millbrook a nd the Dutchess DAO are granted. While Plaintiff has filed two Amended Complaints, this is the first time he has been alerted to the deficiencies in his allegations of municipal liability. This dismissal is, therefore, without prejudice. Plaintiff ma y file an Amended Complaint, if he so chooses, consistent with this Opinion and Order, within 45 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 42 and 44). (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/23/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (mml)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER...For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs motion to add the proposed § 1983 claims is granted. Plaintiffs motion to add the proposed defamation claims is denied. Plaintiff is to file an Amended Complaint without the new defamation claims against proposed Defendants Locke and Marchinkowski within thirty days. Because of the filing of the Amended Complaint, the Court denies the pending Motion s to Dismiss without prejudice. All Defendants may file Motions to Dismiss within their time to answer Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, The Clerk of Court is respectively requested to terminate the pending motions, (Dkt. Nos. 20,22,30,34). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/29/10) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (fk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Berry v. Village of Millbrook | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert D. Berry | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Village of Millbrook | |
| Represented By: | Steven Charles Stern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
