Cox v. The Village of Pleasantville, New York et al
| Brandon Cox |
| The Village of Pleasantville, New York, Town of Mount Pleasant, New York, Aaron Hess, Ronald Beckley, Ronald Gagnon, County of Westchester and John Does # 1-30 |
| 7:2011cv06516 |
| September 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| New York |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
OPINION & ORDER re: 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Aaron Hess, 110 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Village of Pleasantville, New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motions are grant ed in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claims are dismissed. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim and state law assault and battery claims will go forward. Plaintiff's claims against the John Doe Defendants are d ismissed without prejudice. The Court will hold a conference on October 30, 2017, at 2:00 PM to discuss the status of the case. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motions. (See Dkt. Nos. 110, 113.) John Does # 1-30 terminated. (Conference set for 10/30/2017 at 02:00 PM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/26/2017) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
